Case Law
At
his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in October, 1991.....
SEN. PAUL SIMON [former Democratic of Illinois, now
deceased]: …do you consider the right of privacy a fundamental
right?
JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS. Senator, to my knowledge, the Supreme Court, no
majority has used the ninth amendment to establish as the basis for
a right. Of course, it was used by Justice Goldberg and by Justice
Douglas in Griswold. With respect to the approach that I indicated
that I thought was the better approach, it was Justice Harlan's
approach. But with that said, my bottom line was that I felt that
there was a right to privacy in the Constitution, and that the
marital right to privacy, of course, is at the core of that, and
that the marital right to privacy in my view and certainly the view
of the Court is that it is a fundamental right.
| Case Law Citations
(cites) - An excellent reference book for
persons without any legal background is the one titled
"Legal Research" seen on the right..
It will teach you the composition of a case cite that
are
frequently used in family law cases. It will demystify what
you are reading and help you to understand the basis upon
which courts rely to make rulings.
You will learn how to do your own research and understand
what you are doing and why. This is an invaluable guide for
the person who is self-represented in court. It is written
in easy to understand layman's language. |
|
Abstentions:
Alimony:
Alimony and
Extradition:
Alimony
and Attorney's Fees
Alimony
and Retirement:
Contempt:
-
Defined
by
Honorable Carolyn K. Fulmer, District Court of Appeal, 2nd
District, 1999
-
Bowen v. Bowen:
Understanding
Contempt Civil versus Criminal
-
Gregory v. Rice, 727 So.2d 251 (Fla. 1999): This case
involves the wrongful incarceration of a father who failed to pay
child support payments.
-
Robbie v. Robbie, 683 So.2d 1131 (Fla.App. 4 Dist.
1996): Contempt Incarceration - Incarceration for attorney fees -
the current case law improperly extends the statute. Read Farmer's
specially concurring opinion.
-
Shillitani
v. US 1966
-Yes, in a civil contempt trial, no jury trial on the contempt and
imprisonment are permitted.
Gender Bias in the Courts:
Right
to Privacy
Separation of Powers
Federal Case Law
-
Section 1983
Litigation: The fundamental issues that arise in
litigation under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, the statute for redressing
constitutional and federal statutory violations, and the case
law interpreting those issues.
Home
| Ballot Initiative Petition | Case Law
| Federal Filings
Self-Help | Forum |
Articles | Press Releases
| Links
|
FAQ's | Chairman's
Message | About
Us | Contact us
We offer
a disclaimer that this website does not represent legal advice nor is it a
solicitation for legal work.
|
Copyright 2004 © Center for Freedom
and Privacy. All Rights Reserved.
Page last updated: May 19, 2006
|
|
|
|